High Court Ruling Limits Met Police's Ability to Dismiss Officers Without Vetting Clearance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0df5b/0df5b771323dc42722a30398236ad545b725a654" alt=""
February 20, 2025
A recent High Court ruling in the United Kingdom has left policing in a "hopeless position," according to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley. The decision came after Sergeant Lino Di Maria successfully challenged his dismissal following the removal of his vetting clearance due to sexual assault allegations. Di Maria denied the allegations and was not charged.
The court found the process used by the Met to dismiss Di Maria was fundamentally unfair, as it did not provide a proper opportunity for officers to defend themselves. Mrs. Justice Lang ruled that the Met's powers do not "extend to the dismissal of a police officer by reason of withdrawal of vetting clearance," highlighting a legal gap in the current regulations. She noted that this gap resulted in an "anomalous situation" where officers without basic vetting clearance cannot be dismissed.
The case has significant implications for Sir Mark Rowley's efforts to remove officers he believes are unfit for duty, including those who "cannot be trusted to work with women" or "enter the homes of vulnerable people." He described the situation as "absolutely absurd," emphasizing the lack of a lawful mechanism to remove such officers.
The ruling also has broader implications for police reforms aimed at improving safety and trust within the force. It follows public outcry over high-profile cases such as those involving Wayne Couzens and David Carrick, leading the Met to launch Operation Assure, a review process for vetting clearance.
Currently, 29 officers are on special vetting leave, receiving full pay and pension, as the Met lacks a mechanism to dismiss them. The force intends to appeal the ruling, while the Home Office has stated it is "acting rapidly" to close the regulatory loophole.
London's Independent Victims' Commissioner, Claire Waxman, called the ruling a "significant blow" to efforts to "root out dangerous officers and restore public trust." Meanwhile, domestic abuse charity Refuge urged the government to amend regulations urgently.
Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan expressed disappointment with the judgment but supported the Met's appeal, reinforcing the need for a police service that meets the expectations of Londoners.
In light of the challenges highlighted by this recent court ruling and ongoing efforts to address the vetting process, it’s clear that improving the integrity of policing requires systemic change. Enhancing women's representation in policing is a crucial part of this effort. Not only does it promote gender equality, but it also strengthens the ability of law enforcement to engage with diverse communities effectively. Diverse teams are better positioned to address the needs of the public, fostering trust and cooperation. Prioritising the recruitment, support, and retention of women in policing roles is essential for creating a more effective, accountable, and just policing system that can regain public confidence and ensure the safety of all.
To read the full story, see here